sábado, 20 de diciembre de 2014

Epidemiology of Human Plague in the United States, 1900–2012 - Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

full-text ►

Epidemiology of Human Plague in the United States, 1900–2012 - Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC



Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015

CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Epidemiology of Human Plague in the United States, 1900–2012

Kiersten J. KugelerComments to Author , J. Erin Staples, Alison F. Hinckley, Kenneth L. Gage, and Paul S. Mead
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Abstract

We summarize the characteristics of 1,006 cases of human plague occurring in the United States over 113 years, beginning with the first documented case in 1900. Three distinct eras can be identified on the basis of the frequency, nature, and geographic distribution of cases. During 1900–1925, outbreaks were common but were restricted to populous port cities. During 1926–1964, the geographic range of disease expanded rapidly, while the total number of reported cases fell. During 1965–2012, sporadic cases occurred annually, primarily in the rural Southwest. Clinical and demographic features of human illness have shifted over time as the disease has moved from crowded cities to the rural West. These shifts reflect changes in the populations at risk, the advent of antibiotics, and improved detection of more clinically indistinct forms of infection. Overall, the emergence of human plague in the United States parallels observed patterns of introduction of exotic plants and animals.
Plague is a globally distributed, zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis (1,2). In the late 1890s, rat-infested steamships introduced the disease into the continental United States (1,3,4). The first documented autochthonous human infection occurred in the Chinatown section of San Francisco, California, in March of 1900. Cases were soon reported in other port cities, including New Orleans, Galveston, Seattle, and Los Angeles (3,5). Along the Pacific Coast, infection spread from urban rats to native rodent species, and by the 1950s, Y. pestis had spread eastward to reach western portions of the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. This distribution has remained static for >60 years, presumably the result of climatic and ecologic factors that limit further spread (3,59). Although poorly defined, these factors may be related to the ecology of vector species rather than that of rodent hosts (8).
The history of human plague in the United States provides a unique opportunity for long-term study of a zoonotic disease introduced onto a continent. Although the medical and scientific literature has detailed case histories and epidemiologic findings of plague cases in the United States, most reports have been limited in geographic scope or time frame (46,1021). We use data from all reported human plague cases in the United States during 1900–2012 to summarize and describe changes in the epidemiology of plague since its introduction.

Dr. Kugeler is an epidemiologist with the Bacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Acknowledgment


We thank the clinicians, laboratorians, and public health professionals whose records were utilized for this analysis. We also thank Anna Perea for assistance with figure preparation.

References

  1. Pollitzer R. Plague. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1954 [cited 2014 Nov 3].http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/41628/1/WHO_MONO_22.pdf?ua=1
  2. Dennis DTMead PSYersinia species, including plague. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010. p. 2943–53.
  3. Link VBA history of plague in United States of America. Public Health Monogr1955;26:1120 .PubMed
  4. Reed WPPalmer DLWilliams RC JrKisch ALBubonic plague in the southwestern United States: a review of recent experience. Medicine (Baltimore)1970;49:46586DOIPubMed
  5. Caten JLKartman LHuman plague in the United States 1900–1966. JAMA1968;205:3336DOIPubMed
  6. Kartman LGoldenberg MIHubbert WTRecent observations on the epidemiology of plague in the United States. Am J Public Health Nations Health1966;56:155469DOIPubMed
  7. Adjemian JZFoley PGage KLFoley JEInitiation and spread of traveling waves of plague, Yersinia pestis, in the western United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg2007;76:36575 .PubMed
  8. Maher SPEllis CGage KLEnscore REPeterson ATRange-wide determinants of plague distribution in North America. Am J Trop Med Hyg.2010;83:73642DOIPubMed
  9. Ben Ari TGershunov AGage KLSnall TEttestad PKausrud KLHuman plague in the USA: the importance of regional and local climate. Biol Lett.2008;4:73740DOIPubMed
  10. Kaufmann AFBoyce JMMartone WJFrom the Center for Disease Control. Trends in human plague in the United States. J Infect Dis.1980;141:5224DOIPubMed
  11. Mann JMMartone WJBoyce JMKaufmann AFBarnes AMWeber NSEndemic human plague in New Mexico: risk factors associated with infection. J Infect Dis1979;140:397401DOIPubMed
  12. Barnes AMQuan TJBeard MLMaupin GOPlague in American Indians, 1956–1987. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ1988;37:116 .PubMed
  13. Anderson ETPlague in the continental United States, 1900–76. Public Health Rep1978;93:297301 .PubMed
  14. Eidson MTierney LARollag OJBecker TBrown THull HFFeline plague in New Mexico: risk factors and transmission to humans. Am J Public Health1988;78:13335DOIPubMed
  15. Hull HFMontes JMMann JMSepticemic plague in New Mexico. J Infect Dis1987;155:1138DOIPubMed
  16. Palmer DLKisch ALWilliams RC JrReed WPClinical features of plague in the United States: the 1969–1970 epidemic. J Infect Dis.1971;124:36771DOIPubMed
  17. Craven RBMaupin GOBeard MLQuan TJBarnes AMReported cases of human plague infections in the United States, 1970–1991. J Med Entomol1993;30:75861 .PubMed
  18. von Reyn CFWeber NSTempest BBarnes AMPoland JDBoyce JMEpidemiologic and clinical features of an outbreak of bubonic plague in New Mexico. J Infect Dis1977;136:48994DOIPubMed
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human plague–four states, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:940–3 [cited 2014 Nov 3].http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5534a4.htm
  20. Levy CEGage KLPlague in the United States, 1995–1997. Infect Med1999;16:5464.
  21. Dickie WM. Plague in California 1900–1925. Proceedings of the Conference of State Provincial Health Authorities of North America; 1926. p. 30–78 [cited 2014 Nov 3].
  22. Dennis DTGage KLGratz NDPoland JDTikhomirov E. Plague manual: epidemiology, distribution, surveillance and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999 [cited 2014 Nov 11]. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/plague/WHO_CDS_CSR_EDC_99_2_EN/en/
  23. Sakai AKAllendorf FWHolt JSLodge DMMolofsky JWith KAThe population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst2001;32:30532.DOI
  24. Cadotte MWMcMahon SMFukami T, editors. Conceptual ecology and invasion biology: reciprocal approaches to nature. Dordrech (Netherlands): Springer; 2006.
  25. Hengeveld R. Dynamics of biological invasions. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
  26. Abbott RCRocke TE. Plague, Reston, Virginia: United States Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey Circular 1372, 2012 [cited 2014 Nov 3]. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1372/pdf/C1372_Plague.pdf
  27. U.S. Census Bureau. Historical census statistics on population totals by race, 1790 to 1990. 2005 [cited June 21 2011];http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0076/twps0076.html
  28. Hobbs FStoops N. Demographic trends in the 20th century. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 2002 [cited 2014 Nov 3].http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/censr-4.pdf
  29. von Reyn CFBarnes AMWeber NSHodgin UGBubonic plague from exposure to a rabbit: a documented case, and a review of rabbit-associated plague cases in the United States. Am J Epidemiol1976;104:817 .PubMed
  30. Vadyvaloo VJarrett CSturdevant DESebbane FHinnebusch BJTransit through the flea vector induces a pretransmission innate immunity resistance phenotype in Yersinia pestis. PLoS Pathog2010;6:e1000783DOIPubMed
  31. Sebbane FJarrett CGardner DLong DHinnebusch BJRole of the Yersinia pestis yersiniabactin iron acquisition system in the incidence of flea-borne plague. PLoS ONE2010;5:e14379DOIPubMed
  32. Dennis DTGage KL. Plague. In: Cohen J, Powderly WG, editors. Infectious diseases. London: Mosby; 2004. p. 1641–8.
  33. Lipson LGPlague in San Francisco in 1900. The United States Marine Hospital Service Commission to study the existence of plague in San Francisco.Ann Intern Med1972;77:30310DOIPubMed
  34. Inglesby TVDennis DTHenderson DABartlett JGAscher MSEitzen EPlague as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA2000;283:228190DOIPubMed
  35. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new antibacterial treatment for plague. 2012 [cited 2014 Mar 13];http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm302220.htm
  36. Schotthoefer AMEisen RJKugeler KJEttestad PReynolds PJBrown TChanging socioeconomic indicators of human plague, New Mexico, USA.Emerg Infect Dis2012;18:11514DOIPubMed
  37. Gould LHPape JEttestad PGriffith KSMead PS. Dog-associated risk factors for human plague. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:448–54.
  38. Tourdjman M, Ibraheem M, Brett M, Debess E, Progulske B, Ettestad P, et al. Misidentification of Yersinia pestis by automated systems, resulting in delayed diagnoses of human plague infections–Oregon and New Mexico, 2010–2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:e58–60.
  39. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionPlague—South Carolina. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep1983;32:4178.PubMed
  40. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionImported plague—New York City, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2003;52:7258.PubMed

Figure

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: Kugeler KJ, Staples JE, Hinckley AF, Gage KL, Mead PS. Epidemiology of human plague in the United States, 1900–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Jan [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2101.140564
DOI: 10.3201/eid2101.140564

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario